Truvada whores (2)

[Dänk 42Ø]

Hmm... Last night's post didn't seem to go through, so here is an
abbreviated version of the original post that I have re-written:

Truvada is an expensive new drug (US$1500/month) that contains three
or four antivirals that reduce the chance of infection after
unprotected sex with an HIV carrier by about 80%. Because it is
not 100%, the doctors who prescribe it still recommend the use of
condoms. And this 80% protection is only achieved through the
REGULAR DAILY USE of the drug, something the promiscuous tweaked-
twinks who use it are unlikely to do, using it more as a morning-
after pill. And condoms have been largely abandoned thanks to
what is perceived as a miracle prevention drug.

As everyone knows, HIV quickly develops resistance to drugs that
are not taken regularly. As time goes on, Truvada will become
less and less effective, which is problematic since the drugs it
contains are used in conventional HIV therapy. There are only a
limited number of HIV antiviral drugs, each with its own set of
effectiveness and unpleasant side-effects.

With condoms gone, new HIV infections will soar. The pharmaceutical
industry loves this, since they make trillions off of Truvada, the
individual drugs it contains, and the new ones they will have to
develop to keep the HIV virus in check. Their worst fear is a
successful vaccine, which is why most funding for that comes from
the government.

Truvada should be outlawed. It provides a false sense of security
while only making the problem worse. It also seems unethical to
prescribe such a drug to healthy people, as all you are giving them
is side-effects while encouraging them to engage in unprotected
sex.

[Governor Swill]

On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:38:28 +0000, Dänk 42Ø

Post by Dänk 42Ø
Hmm... Last night's post didn't seem to go through, so here is an

I read it already. It came through my server.

Swill

Post by Dänk 42Ø
Truvada is an expensive new drug (US$1500/month) that contains three
or four antivirals that reduce the chance of infection after
unprotected sex with an HIV carrier by about 80%. Because it is
not 100%, the doctors who prescribe it still recommend the use of
condoms. And this 80% protection is only achieved through the
REGULAR DAILY USE of the drug, something the promiscuous tweaked-
twinks who use it are unlikely to do, using it more as a morning-
after pill. And condoms have been largely abandoned thanks to
what is perceived as a miracle prevention drug.
As everyone knows, HIV quickly develops resistance to drugs that
are not taken regularly. As time goes on, Truvada will become
less and less effective, which is problematic since the drugs it
contains are used in conventional HIV therapy. There are only a
limited number of HIV antiviral drugs, each with its own set of
effectiveness and unpleasant side-effects.
With condoms gone, new HIV infections will soar. The pharmaceutical
industry loves this, since they make trillions off of Truvada, the
individual drugs it contains, and the new ones they will have to
develop to keep the HIV virus in check. Their worst fear is a
successful vaccine, which is why most funding for that comes from
the government.
Truvada should be outlawed. It provides a false sense of security
while only making the problem worse. It also seems unethical to
prescribe such a drug to healthy people, as all you are giving them
is side-effects while encouraging them to engage in unprotected
sex.

--
The only time NATO has ever invoked Article 5 and rushed to
the aid of a NATO ally in response to an attack was on September 11,
2001. On that day, monsters murdered 2,977 people in New York
City; Washington, DC; and Shanksville, PA.

Almost 3,000 Americans were murdered by monsters and our NATO
allies for the first time in the history of the NATO Alliance
rose as one and defended American airspace and American interests
around the entire freaking world while we wrestled with what had happened.

Donald Trump wants to turn NATO into a damn shakedown scheme and
you people are cheering him on.
You should be ashamed of yourselves.
You should be ashamed of the fact that your cult leader who claims
to have been personally affected by 9/11 does not even know our NATO allies
protected his ass that day.
You should be ashamed that he wants to turn one of the strongest military
alliances in the history of the world into a racket where
protection is bought.
You should be ashamed that you are not ashamed. -- Eric Erickson