Jeffrey Rubard
2022-01-20 03:51:23 UTC
Modern thinking on the issue, away from pills and "mills".
It is said by some that, in the case of *exclusively heterosexual men*
(a category which might exist through frustrated lack of self-realization, if it be doubted - I am not one such)
the real statistical benefit of latex prophylactic use *adhered to rigorously*,
as though it would be a "mortal sin" to bareback, in heterosexual dating that "for simplicity's sake" reduces the incidence of anal sex to almost zero, would produce a person that *almost no believable risk for HIV*, even without PReP, and thusly would be highly unlikely to become even a *low-risk spreader* in frequent vaginal sex. (There is said to be some empirical evidence of this among the "Tinder set".)
That is to say: if you always wear a rubber and always choose "traditional" intercourse -- heavily favored by many women -- the number of dates you go on, or even the "health condition" (serostatus) of your female partners, would be a matter of taste. Statistics and demographics would really mean a very full sex life was *practically and rationally* virtually free of the risk of HIV. ("Sex-positive women" may want to mull this a bit.)
It is said by some that, in the case of *exclusively heterosexual men*
(a category which might exist through frustrated lack of self-realization, if it be doubted - I am not one such)
the real statistical benefit of latex prophylactic use *adhered to rigorously*,
as though it would be a "mortal sin" to bareback, in heterosexual dating that "for simplicity's sake" reduces the incidence of anal sex to almost zero, would produce a person that *almost no believable risk for HIV*, even without PReP, and thusly would be highly unlikely to become even a *low-risk spreader* in frequent vaginal sex. (There is said to be some empirical evidence of this among the "Tinder set".)
That is to say: if you always wear a rubber and always choose "traditional" intercourse -- heavily favored by many women -- the number of dates you go on, or even the "health condition" (serostatus) of your female partners, would be a matter of taste. Statistics and demographics would really mean a very full sex life was *practically and rationally* virtually free of the risk of HIV. ("Sex-positive women" may want to mull this a bit.)